The right price for entertainment
Do you like paying €20 for a CD? I doubt it. As a consequence, fewer people pay full price for a CD. With most of that money going to the record and distribution companies looking to make a buck instead of giving us great music, there isn’t too much moral incentive to pay that full price either. The artists’ cut is minimal. But how much should you pay so that the producers – artists and the required machinery around them – get their fair share also?
Due to the high prices, what’s happened is more and more people go online and download their music for free as MP3s. Which is what I did, too – it’s mostly convenient and legal in our corner of the planet, too, so why wouldn’t one? As a business model, nobody paying for any music is clearly unsustainable. But the current situation where the entertainment industry is stubbornly fighting against a major structural change that they are in denial about is also unsustainable. Most other industries have already gone through a structural change or a few and they survived – changed, but survived. For better and/or worse, the world is changing and all industries, including the entertainment industry, must change with it or face the music – pun intended.
From a consumer-point of view, CD prices and online music prices are mostly ridiculous. There is NO WAY I would normally pay 20eur – or even 10eur – for 45mins of music. iTunes not only has stupid DRM limitations but it’s still too pricey at 0.99eur per song. So what is the correct price?
I’m convinced that allofmp3.com – a place that I’ve mentioned some times before – has found the perfect basic model with their innovative volume-based pricing. I’m actually quite surprised to see how well volume-based pricing can work. What is so great about their service is that you get to choose what encoding to use (i.e. music quality – the better the quality, the more you pay) plus there’s no DRM protection of any kind. At $0.02 per MB albums come out around $1 to $2 depending on the encoding used. And you can even download some with lossless encoding. Plus it’s completely legal, too. Non-DRM’d content and the artists get their share – maybe not a big share, but you could easily double their prices, route all the extra money to the artists and like magic, they’d get more than they do now.
Oh, and there’s none of that encryption-breaking the Finnish legislators are so worried about..
Photo by freefoto.com








September 20th, 2005 at 13:20
The only problem is that they don’t pay that many roaylties to artists. I’m actually convinced, even though I wrote about this in my blog, that the artists don’t get a share of the income.
The price however is right and record companies should really start to see the value in pricing their artists this cheap. Because let’s face it, it’s not about the costs that keep the prices high, it’s the record labels. Internet brings them incredible volumes to their doorstep and they turn them away.
Now where’s the business logic in that?
September 20th, 2005 at 13:23
It’s true that they probably don’t pay all that great royalties. But like I said, their model is easily improved upon: you could double the price (which still keeps it very low) and funnel all that extra revenue to the artists. That way they would earn as much or more than they do from current CD sales.
That model, one would think, is something that would work even if hosted outside Russia.
September 20th, 2005 at 13:33
Definitely – agree with that 100%. Here are two interviews I found regarding allofmp3.com
http://www.technewsworld.com/story/34512.html
and
http://www.museekster.com/mp3searchinterview.htm